Architecture ∩ Project ∩ Philosophy
Апстракт
The title of this first issue of Khōrein is written in the lan-guage of Boolean algebra: Architecture ∧ Philosophy. This formal codifi-cation allows me to make three premises and begin to outline my project. First, I would like to make a distinction between symbols, starting with the consideration that the symbol representing intersection in set theory (∩) is different from the symbol representing the Boolean operator AND (∧). Given the formal “correspondence” between Boolean AND and intersec-tion in set theory, I would tend to use this second meaning for my reason-ing: thus, to begin with, I would place “Architecture ∩ Philosophy” as the premise, instead of “Architecture ∧ Philosophy.” Secondly, it is necessary for me to introduce another set into the discourse, namely the “project.” Thirdly, I must ask myself whether it is possible to find a further intersec-tion between “architectural project” and “philosophy.” For this purpose, I will proceed through a series of statements, constru...cting them as transi-tions from a term X to a term Y. Each transit (“from X to Y”) should be verified in two stages: first by describing how it belongs to the intersec-tion set ‘architecture ∩ project’. In a second step, I should provide some references to philosophy texts that have made each transit viable within the architectural project. Both operations will only be carried out on the first two statements in a sketchy manner, then my project draft will stop.
Кључне речи:
architectural design theory / project of architecture / architectural practice / process innovation / intersection setИзвор:
Khōrein: Journal for Architecture and Philosophy, 2023, 1, 1, 38-49Издавач:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Armando, Alessandro PY - 2023 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3044 AB - The title of this first issue of Khōrein is written in the lan-guage of Boolean algebra: Architecture ∧ Philosophy. This formal codifi-cation allows me to make three premises and begin to outline my project. First, I would like to make a distinction between symbols, starting with the consideration that the symbol representing intersection in set theory (∩) is different from the symbol representing the Boolean operator AND (∧). Given the formal “correspondence” between Boolean AND and intersec-tion in set theory, I would tend to use this second meaning for my reason-ing: thus, to begin with, I would place “Architecture ∩ Philosophy” as the premise, instead of “Architecture ∧ Philosophy.” Secondly, it is necessary for me to introduce another set into the discourse, namely the “project.” Thirdly, I must ask myself whether it is possible to find a further intersec-tion between “architectural project” and “philosophy.” For this purpose, I will proceed through a series of statements, constructing them as transi-tions from a term X to a term Y. Each transit (“from X to Y”) should be verified in two stages: first by describing how it belongs to the intersec-tion set ‘architecture ∩ project’. In a second step, I should provide some references to philosophy texts that have made each transit viable within the architectural project. Both operations will only be carried out on the first two statements in a sketchy manner, then my project draft will stop. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Khōrein: Journal for Architecture and Philosophy T1 - Architecture ∩ Project ∩ Philosophy IS - 1 VL - 1 SP - 38 EP - 49 DO - 10.5281/zenodo.7905100 ER -
@article{ author = "Armando, Alessandro", year = "2023", abstract = "The title of this first issue of Khōrein is written in the lan-guage of Boolean algebra: Architecture ∧ Philosophy. This formal codifi-cation allows me to make three premises and begin to outline my project. First, I would like to make a distinction between symbols, starting with the consideration that the symbol representing intersection in set theory (∩) is different from the symbol representing the Boolean operator AND (∧). Given the formal “correspondence” between Boolean AND and intersec-tion in set theory, I would tend to use this second meaning for my reason-ing: thus, to begin with, I would place “Architecture ∩ Philosophy” as the premise, instead of “Architecture ∧ Philosophy.” Secondly, it is necessary for me to introduce another set into the discourse, namely the “project.” Thirdly, I must ask myself whether it is possible to find a further intersec-tion between “architectural project” and “philosophy.” For this purpose, I will proceed through a series of statements, constructing them as transi-tions from a term X to a term Y. Each transit (“from X to Y”) should be verified in two stages: first by describing how it belongs to the intersec-tion set ‘architecture ∩ project’. In a second step, I should provide some references to philosophy texts that have made each transit viable within the architectural project. Both operations will only be carried out on the first two statements in a sketchy manner, then my project draft will stop.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Khōrein: Journal for Architecture and Philosophy", title = "Architecture ∩ Project ∩ Philosophy", number = "1", volume = "1", pages = "38-49", doi = "10.5281/zenodo.7905100" }
Armando, A.. (2023). Architecture ∩ Project ∩ Philosophy. in Khōrein: Journal for Architecture and Philosophy Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 1(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7905100
Armando A. Architecture ∩ Project ∩ Philosophy. in Khōrein: Journal for Architecture and Philosophy. 2023;1(1):38-49. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7905100 .
Armando, Alessandro, "Architecture ∩ Project ∩ Philosophy" in Khōrein: Journal for Architecture and Philosophy, 1, no. 1 (2023):38-49, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7905100 . .