Škobić, Milan R.

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
2435c0c1-570c-4242-931a-6939d93d0560
  • Škobić, Milan R. (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Radnička (ne)moć u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji: fabrički režimi rada i razgradnja strukturne moći radništva

Škobić, Milan R.

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2024)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Škobić, Milan R.
PY  - 2024
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3872
AB  - Rad pokušava eksplorativno da osvetli nemoć radništva u pogledu promene sopstvenog lošeg položaja u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji. U radu se tvrdi da sklop odnosa između podružnica, centrala, klijenata i dobavljača u industriji generiše određene elemente režima rada u pojedinim fabrikama koje smanjuju, sakrivaju i fragmentišu strukturnu moć radništva. U tim okolnostima, poslovodstvo može da primenjuje tehnike intenziviranja proizvodnje i učestalog oslanjanja na prekovremeni rad bez otpora radništva. Primenom koncepata teorije resursa moći, režima rada, globalnih proizvodnih mreža, i globalnih lanaca vrednosti, u radu se situira odnos između različitih preduzeća koja čine tu industriju, i radništva u Srbiji. Konkretni elementi režima rada kojim se postižu ovi efekti zavise od pozicije firme u automobilskoj industriji i njene poslovne strategije, što dovodi do heterogene situacije unutar i između fabrika analiziranih u ovom radu. Organizacija proizvodnje dovodi i do mogućnosti rasta, otkrivanja, i ukrupnjavanja latentne ili neiskorišćene strukturne moći, i u radu su identifikovane neke njene instance. Na osnovu te analize, u zaključku su ponuđene smernice za dalje istraživanje koje se tiču povezivanja analize industrije sa njenim širim socijalnim okruženjem, preciznije i sistematičnije analize same industrije, i položaja i uloge sindikata u odnosu između rada i kapitala u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji.
AB  - Workers’ rights are systematically violated in Serbia. On the other hand, the perception of these violations does not lead to sustained attempts at building workers’ power
that could resist these violations and change their working conditions. This paper explores the industry-engendered conditions that inhibit the building of workers’ power
by looking at four automotive subsidiaries of foreign companies in Serbia. This is done
by identifying several ways in which the relationships between subsidiaries, headquarters, clients, and suppliers inhibit sources of workers’ power, in particular their structural power. The paper employs the conceptualization of sources of workers’ power
developed in the tradition of power resource theory: structural, associational, institutional, and societal. In particular, the focus is on the structural source of power as it is
most closely related to the point of production: structural power refers to the power
that can be generated by the position of workers in the labor market, and by their position in the organization of production - within particular factories and the network
of relations between different companies in the industry. Four automotive subsidiaries of foreign investors in Serbia are analyzed to identify labor regimes they set up, and
the elements of those labor regimes that are constituted in relationship with the headquarters, their clients, and suppliers. Labor regimes refer to the wider social set-up in
which the relationship of exploitation is embedded. These labor regimes, and the inter-firm relationships that engender the elements of those regimes, constitute the
strategic environment in which workers’ power would be built, and engender the problems for various segments of the workforce that building workers’ power could address. These four subsidiaries differ in their position in the global production networks
of the automotive industry and are caught up in different governance patterns as conceptualized by the global value chains approach. Several ways in which the structural
power of workers is decomposed are identified, which operate in different ways depending on the position of the particular subsidiary in the automotive industry and
vis-a-vis its headquarters and clients, as well as related to their business and management practices. Subsidiaries of large multinational companies compete with other subsidiaries in other countries to get assigned the execution of contracts struck by
the headquarters. Production lines are prone to being moved between different subsidiaries, thus giving rise to the more targeted threat of production relocation. Decision-making on the composition and parameters of particular production lines can be
divided between the company headquarters and clients. Companies can locate various business functions at the same plant, positioning different segments of the workforce in different chains of command and supply to different clients, thus generating
further differentiation of problems those groups face. Companies coordinate over
wages through following labor market research which defines global pay grades for
different job positions in different geographic locations. The flow of information about
the production processes and business strategies between the management and workers is minimal. These and other elements contribute to diminishing, obscuring, and
fragmenting the structural power of workers, which allows for techniques of forced
overtime and work intensification to be implemented unopposed. This also helps in
preventing workers from acting upon the increases in their latent structural power,
which could arise from the importance of a particular group of workers for performing
a particular production process, accumulation of useful knowledge about the place
of particular production processes in wider employers’ business strategies, or logistical difficulties of shifting different production processes, or the spread of general
problems that might make it easier for workers to identify common interests toward
which realization they can direct the building of workers’ power. The paper concludes
by identifying ways in which the automotive industry in Serbia can be studied in greater depth to identify more precisely conditions in which latent structural power can
rise, and in which the study of industry can be linked to other relevant societal and
environmental processes that can generate increase in other sources of workers power, resources, and capabilities for defending and furthering their interests.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Radnička (ne)moć u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji: fabrički režimi rada i razgradnja strukturne moći radništva
T1  - Workers’ Power(lessness) In the Automotive Industry in Serbia: Factory Labor Regimes and the Deco
IS  - 1
VL  - 5
SP  - 185
EP  - 210
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.11371954
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Škobić, Milan R.",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Rad pokušava eksplorativno da osvetli nemoć radništva u pogledu promene sopstvenog lošeg položaja u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji. U radu se tvrdi da sklop odnosa između podružnica, centrala, klijenata i dobavljača u industriji generiše određene elemente režima rada u pojedinim fabrikama koje smanjuju, sakrivaju i fragmentišu strukturnu moć radništva. U tim okolnostima, poslovodstvo može da primenjuje tehnike intenziviranja proizvodnje i učestalog oslanjanja na prekovremeni rad bez otpora radništva. Primenom koncepata teorije resursa moći, režima rada, globalnih proizvodnih mreža, i globalnih lanaca vrednosti, u radu se situira odnos između različitih preduzeća koja čine tu industriju, i radništva u Srbiji. Konkretni elementi režima rada kojim se postižu ovi efekti zavise od pozicije firme u automobilskoj industriji i njene poslovne strategije, što dovodi do heterogene situacije unutar i između fabrika analiziranih u ovom radu. Organizacija proizvodnje dovodi i do mogućnosti rasta, otkrivanja, i ukrupnjavanja latentne ili neiskorišćene strukturne moći, i u radu su identifikovane neke njene instance. Na osnovu te analize, u zaključku su ponuđene smernice za dalje istraživanje koje se tiču povezivanja analize industrije sa njenim širim socijalnim okruženjem, preciznije i sistematičnije analize same industrije, i položaja i uloge sindikata u odnosu između rada i kapitala u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji., Workers’ rights are systematically violated in Serbia. On the other hand, the perception of these violations does not lead to sustained attempts at building workers’ power
that could resist these violations and change their working conditions. This paper explores the industry-engendered conditions that inhibit the building of workers’ power
by looking at four automotive subsidiaries of foreign companies in Serbia. This is done
by identifying several ways in which the relationships between subsidiaries, headquarters, clients, and suppliers inhibit sources of workers’ power, in particular their structural power. The paper employs the conceptualization of sources of workers’ power
developed in the tradition of power resource theory: structural, associational, institutional, and societal. In particular, the focus is on the structural source of power as it is
most closely related to the point of production: structural power refers to the power
that can be generated by the position of workers in the labor market, and by their position in the organization of production - within particular factories and the network
of relations between different companies in the industry. Four automotive subsidiaries of foreign investors in Serbia are analyzed to identify labor regimes they set up, and
the elements of those labor regimes that are constituted in relationship with the headquarters, their clients, and suppliers. Labor regimes refer to the wider social set-up in
which the relationship of exploitation is embedded. These labor regimes, and the inter-firm relationships that engender the elements of those regimes, constitute the
strategic environment in which workers’ power would be built, and engender the problems for various segments of the workforce that building workers’ power could address. These four subsidiaries differ in their position in the global production networks
of the automotive industry and are caught up in different governance patterns as conceptualized by the global value chains approach. Several ways in which the structural
power of workers is decomposed are identified, which operate in different ways depending on the position of the particular subsidiary in the automotive industry and
vis-a-vis its headquarters and clients, as well as related to their business and management practices. Subsidiaries of large multinational companies compete with other subsidiaries in other countries to get assigned the execution of contracts struck by
the headquarters. Production lines are prone to being moved between different subsidiaries, thus giving rise to the more targeted threat of production relocation. Decision-making on the composition and parameters of particular production lines can be
divided between the company headquarters and clients. Companies can locate various business functions at the same plant, positioning different segments of the workforce in different chains of command and supply to different clients, thus generating
further differentiation of problems those groups face. Companies coordinate over
wages through following labor market research which defines global pay grades for
different job positions in different geographic locations. The flow of information about
the production processes and business strategies between the management and workers is minimal. These and other elements contribute to diminishing, obscuring, and
fragmenting the structural power of workers, which allows for techniques of forced
overtime and work intensification to be implemented unopposed. This also helps in
preventing workers from acting upon the increases in their latent structural power,
which could arise from the importance of a particular group of workers for performing
a particular production process, accumulation of useful knowledge about the place
of particular production processes in wider employers’ business strategies, or logistical difficulties of shifting different production processes, or the spread of general
problems that might make it easier for workers to identify common interests toward
which realization they can direct the building of workers’ power. The paper concludes
by identifying ways in which the automotive industry in Serbia can be studied in greater depth to identify more precisely conditions in which latent structural power can
rise, and in which the study of industry can be linked to other relevant societal and
environmental processes that can generate increase in other sources of workers power, resources, and capabilities for defending and furthering their interests.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Radnička (ne)moć u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji: fabrički režimi rada i razgradnja strukturne moći radništva, Workers’ Power(lessness) In the Automotive Industry in Serbia: Factory Labor Regimes and the Deco",
number = "1",
volume = "5",
pages = "185-210",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.11371954"
}
Škobić, M. R.. (2024). Radnička (ne)moć u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji: fabrički režimi rada i razgradnja strukturne moći radništva. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 5(1), 185-210.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11371954
Škobić MR. Radnička (ne)moć u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji: fabrički režimi rada i razgradnja strukturne moći radništva. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2024;5(1):185-210.
doi:10.5281/zenodo.11371954 .
Škobić, Milan R., "Radnička (ne)moć u automobilskoj industriji u Srbiji: fabrički režimi rada i razgradnja strukturne moći radništva" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 5, no. 1 (2024):185-210,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11371954 . .