TY  - CONF
AU  - Filipović, Aleksa
AU  - Milovanović, Aleksandar
AU  - Đukić, Andrej
AU  - Nedeljković, Boban
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Kušić, Marija
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3865
AB  - The study aims to establish the nomological network of Ingroup criticism (IGC), a novel
construct conceptualized as a propensity to be critical toward one’s own society. This
encapsulates negative attitudes toward authoritarian, nationalistic, and parochial social and
political practices, as well as extremely negative prejudices, hatred, and intolerance toward
one’s own national group. We examined its relationships with a broad spectrum of constructs
classified into eight blocks: socio-demographic variables, personality traits and related
variables, thinking styles and dispositions, socio-political attitudes, prejudice, moral
sensitivity, free market ideology, and ethnocentrism. IGC was assessed via the previously
developed 40-item Ingroup criticism scale. The scale consists of four subscales
(Autochauvinism, Perception of in-group as intolerant and hostile, Perception of in-group as
authoritarian and corrupt, Rejection of conspiratorial interpretation of IGC). The sample (N =
806; 44.9% women; Mage = 40.99, SDage = 13.56) was drawn from the general population and
recruited via social network platforms. To examine the relations between constructs, we conducted an eight-step hierarchical regression analysis with our general factor (i.e., Ingroup criticism) as a criterion and the aforementioned eight blocks of variables as predictors. All blocks (except free market ideology) contributed significantly to this prediction. The sociodemographics explained 1.5% of variance (F(5, 800) = 2.52, p = .028), personality traits and related variables 10.9% (F(11, 789) = 8.91, p < .001), thinking dispositions and styles 5% (F(4, 785) = 12.26, p < .001), socio-political attitudes 16.6% (F(4, 781) = 49.26, p < .001), moral sensitivity 11.7% (F(2, 779) = 84.14, p < .001), prejudices 4.4% (F(1, 779) = 69.39, p < .001), and ethnocentrism 18.1% (F(2, 774) = 222.9, p < .001). The overall percentage of explained variance amounts to 68.6%. Our results show that those prone to IGC tend to be low on ethnocentrism and national pride, to strongly adopt democratic values, are sensitive moral progressivists (morality based on fairness and care), not prejudiced, conscientious, but with slightly elevated Disintegration, proneness to anger, dissatisfaction with life, and need for closure. We discuss the position of IGC at the crossroad of personality and sociopolitical attitudes.
PB  - Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju
T1  - There is no one worse than us: The construct validity of the Ingroup criticism scale
SP  - 61
EP  - 61
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3865
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Filipović, Aleksa and Milovanović, Aleksandar and Đukić, Andrej and Nedeljković, Boban and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Kušić, Marija and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The study aims to establish the nomological network of Ingroup criticism (IGC), a novel
construct conceptualized as a propensity to be critical toward one’s own society. This
encapsulates negative attitudes toward authoritarian, nationalistic, and parochial social and
political practices, as well as extremely negative prejudices, hatred, and intolerance toward
one’s own national group. We examined its relationships with a broad spectrum of constructs
classified into eight blocks: socio-demographic variables, personality traits and related
variables, thinking styles and dispositions, socio-political attitudes, prejudice, moral
sensitivity, free market ideology, and ethnocentrism. IGC was assessed via the previously
developed 40-item Ingroup criticism scale. The scale consists of four subscales
(Autochauvinism, Perception of in-group as intolerant and hostile, Perception of in-group as
authoritarian and corrupt, Rejection of conspiratorial interpretation of IGC). The sample (N =
806; 44.9% women; Mage = 40.99, SDage = 13.56) was drawn from the general population and
recruited via social network platforms. To examine the relations between constructs, we conducted an eight-step hierarchical regression analysis with our general factor (i.e., Ingroup criticism) as a criterion and the aforementioned eight blocks of variables as predictors. All blocks (except free market ideology) contributed significantly to this prediction. The sociodemographics explained 1.5% of variance (F(5, 800) = 2.52, p = .028), personality traits and related variables 10.9% (F(11, 789) = 8.91, p < .001), thinking dispositions and styles 5% (F(4, 785) = 12.26, p < .001), socio-political attitudes 16.6% (F(4, 781) = 49.26, p < .001), moral sensitivity 11.7% (F(2, 779) = 84.14, p < .001), prejudices 4.4% (F(1, 779) = 69.39, p < .001), and ethnocentrism 18.1% (F(2, 774) = 222.9, p < .001). The overall percentage of explained variance amounts to 68.6%. Our results show that those prone to IGC tend to be low on ethnocentrism and national pride, to strongly adopt democratic values, are sensitive moral progressivists (morality based on fairness and care), not prejudiced, conscientious, but with slightly elevated Disintegration, proneness to anger, dissatisfaction with life, and need for closure. We discuss the position of IGC at the crossroad of personality and sociopolitical attitudes.",
publisher = "Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju",
title = "There is no one worse than us: The construct validity of the Ingroup criticism scale",
pages = "61-61",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3865"
}

Filipović, A., Milovanović, A., Đukić, A., Nedeljković, B., Lazarević, L. B., Kušić, M.,& Knežević, G.. (2023). There is no one worse than us: The construct validity of the Ingroup criticism scale. 
Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju., 61-61.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3865

Filipović A, Milovanović A, Đukić A, Nedeljković B, Lazarević LB, Kušić M, Knežević G. There is no one worse than us: The construct validity of the Ingroup criticism scale. 2023;:61-61.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3865 .

Filipović, Aleksa, Milovanović, Aleksandar, Đukić, Andrej, Nedeljković, Boban, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Kušić, Marija, Knežević, Goran, "There is no one worse than us: The construct validity of the Ingroup criticism scale" (2023):61-61,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3865 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Milovanović, Aleksandar
AU  - Filipović, Aleksa
AU  - Đukić, Andrej
AU  - Nedeljković, Boban
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Kušić, Marija
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3864
AB  - The term “auto-chauvinism” gained much popularity in public and political discourse in Serbia
in past years. It was mainly used to denote those individuals who express negative and
sometimes extremely critical attitudes toward Serbian society. Until now, the phenomenon did
not receive adequate psychologists’ attention. We aimed to understand the phenomenon better
by constructing a scale to measure it, as the first step. The initial pool of over 200 items that
could tap the auto-chauvinism comprised statements (e.g., “Others rightly see us as a wild
people”) drawn from books, newspaper articles, and media appearances of those who labeled
others as auto-chauvinists as well as those who were labeled this way. Eight researchers rated
face validity, clarity, and formulation simplicity of all statements. After items with the lowest
ratings were excluded, a set of 152 items was administered to the convenient sample (N = 890;
59.3% females; Mage = 38.8, SDage = 12.8) alongside right-wing (RWA) and left-wing
authoritarianism (LWA) scales. Exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation yielded four
factors with high loadings (>.60) on a higher-order factor we labeled In-Group Criticism (IGC):
Auto-chauvinism (e.g., “Crime is in our genes”), Perception of in-group as hostile and
intolerant to differences (e.g., “There is no culture of dialogue here”), Perception of in-group
as authoritarian and corrupt (e.g., “All our heroes are war criminals”), and Rejection of
conspiratorial interpretation of IGC (e.g., “Our fighters for democracy and the rule of law are foreign mercenaries”). In the next step, we created a 40-item version of the scale (10 per
component) by selecting the items with the highest loadings on the respective factors that
simultaneously represent all levels of the assumed continuum of IGC according to the one parameter logistic Item response theory model. Cronbach alpha of the total score was .95, and
the reliability of subscales was .90 - .91. Bi-factor exploratory structural equation model,
assuming the existence of a strong general factor and four residual factors, was found to be the
most adequate (CFI = .936, SRMR = .036, RMSEA = .043). The correlation of IGC with RWA
was substantial (r = -.51, p < .001) but even higher with LWA (r = .64, p < .001). When it
comes to sub-dimensions of RWA and LWA the correlation of IGC with LWA Anti-conventionalism was the largest (r =.74, p < .001). In sum, our results indicated that auto-chauvinism could be seen as a part of general IGC tendencies that are measurable by the
proposed, psychometrically sound instrument.
PB  - Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju
T1  - Is Auto-chauvinism a measurable psychological construct?
SP  - 60
EP  - 60
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3864
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Milovanović, Aleksandar and Filipović, Aleksa and Đukić, Andrej and Nedeljković, Boban and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Kušić, Marija and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The term “auto-chauvinism” gained much popularity in public and political discourse in Serbia
in past years. It was mainly used to denote those individuals who express negative and
sometimes extremely critical attitudes toward Serbian society. Until now, the phenomenon did
not receive adequate psychologists’ attention. We aimed to understand the phenomenon better
by constructing a scale to measure it, as the first step. The initial pool of over 200 items that
could tap the auto-chauvinism comprised statements (e.g., “Others rightly see us as a wild
people”) drawn from books, newspaper articles, and media appearances of those who labeled
others as auto-chauvinists as well as those who were labeled this way. Eight researchers rated
face validity, clarity, and formulation simplicity of all statements. After items with the lowest
ratings were excluded, a set of 152 items was administered to the convenient sample (N = 890;
59.3% females; Mage = 38.8, SDage = 12.8) alongside right-wing (RWA) and left-wing
authoritarianism (LWA) scales. Exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation yielded four
factors with high loadings (>.60) on a higher-order factor we labeled In-Group Criticism (IGC):
Auto-chauvinism (e.g., “Crime is in our genes”), Perception of in-group as hostile and
intolerant to differences (e.g., “There is no culture of dialogue here”), Perception of in-group
as authoritarian and corrupt (e.g., “All our heroes are war criminals”), and Rejection of
conspiratorial interpretation of IGC (e.g., “Our fighters for democracy and the rule of law are foreign mercenaries”). In the next step, we created a 40-item version of the scale (10 per
component) by selecting the items with the highest loadings on the respective factors that
simultaneously represent all levels of the assumed continuum of IGC according to the one parameter logistic Item response theory model. Cronbach alpha of the total score was .95, and
the reliability of subscales was .90 - .91. Bi-factor exploratory structural equation model,
assuming the existence of a strong general factor and four residual factors, was found to be the
most adequate (CFI = .936, SRMR = .036, RMSEA = .043). The correlation of IGC with RWA
was substantial (r = -.51, p < .001) but even higher with LWA (r = .64, p < .001). When it
comes to sub-dimensions of RWA and LWA the correlation of IGC with LWA Anti-conventionalism was the largest (r =.74, p < .001). In sum, our results indicated that auto-chauvinism could be seen as a part of general IGC tendencies that are measurable by the
proposed, psychometrically sound instrument.",
publisher = "Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju",
title = "Is Auto-chauvinism a measurable psychological construct?",
pages = "60-60",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3864"
}

Milovanović, A., Filipović, A., Đukić, A., Nedeljković, B., Lazarević, L. B., Kušić, M.,& Knežević, G.. (2023). Is Auto-chauvinism a measurable psychological construct?. 
Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju., 60-60.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3864

Milovanović A, Filipović A, Đukić A, Nedeljković B, Lazarević LB, Kušić M, Knežević G. Is Auto-chauvinism a measurable psychological construct?. 2023;:60-60.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3864 .

Milovanović, Aleksandar, Filipović, Aleksa, Đukić, Andrej, Nedeljković, Boban, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Kušić, Marija, Knežević, Goran, "Is Auto-chauvinism a measurable psychological construct?" (2023):60-60,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3864 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3731
AB  - People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and sufer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (diferent unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study ofers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.
PB  - Nature Portfolio
T2  - Scientific Reports
T1  - Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana and Knežević, Goran and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, Marija and Ninković, Milica and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Branković, Marija and Lukić, Petar and Opačić, Goran and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and sufer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (diferent unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study ofers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.",
publisher = "Nature Portfolio",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
title = "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w"
}

Lazarević, L., Knežević, G., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Petrović, M., Ninković, M., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Opačić, G.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports
Nature Portfolio., 13.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w

Lazarević L, Knežević G, Purić D, Teovanović P, Petrović M, Ninković M, Živanović M, Stanković S, Branković M, Lukić P, Opačić G, Žeželj I. Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports. 2023;13.
doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w .

Lazarević, Ljiljana, Knežević, Goran, Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, Marija, Ninković, Milica, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Branković, Marija, Lukić, Petar, Opačić, Goran, Žeželj, Iris, "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study" in Scientific Reports, 13 (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Stojanović, Anđela
AU  - Ilić, Stojan
AU  - Tucaković, Lana
AU  - Ranđelović, Milan
AU  - Jevtić, Miloš
AU  - Mijatović, Nevena
AU  - Dojčinović, Sara
AU  - Dimoski, Jana
AU  - Pfattheicher, Stefan
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3138
AB  - The vast majority of studies investigating personality structure is done using adult samples. If 
personality is assessed in children, parental ratings are preferably used method, while self reports are seldom used. Here we use self-report measures to study the developmental 
stability of the seven-factor personality structure defined by the HEXACO model and 
Disintegration trait. We focus on middle childhood children, young teens, and teenagers. 
Sample consisted of four groups: 1) age 10-11 (N=164, 49.4% female), 2) age 12-13 (N=195, 
48.9% female), 3) age 14-16 (N=319, 59.2% female), 4) age 17-18 (N=201, 49.5% female). 
Data were collected in several elementary and high schools in Serbia and Montenegro. 
Personality traits were assessed using 60 items HEXACO, and 20 items DELTA 
questionnaires. The stability of the seven-factor personality structure was tested using 
orthogonal procrustes rotations, and the analysis was done on facets of all seven personality 
traits. Congruence coefficients and factor loadings were calculated for all facets for all six 
pairwise comparisons. Overall, the average congruence of factors ranged between .69 
(Emotionality) and .96 (Disintegration). The average congruence of facets ranged between 
.41 (Sincerity) and .95 (Sentimentality), with the majority of facets having average 
congruence above .85. Average factor loadings for Disintegration range between .55 (Depression) and .85 (Perceptual Distortions), for Honesty between .20 (Sincerity) and .39 
(Greed avoidance), for Emotionality between .19 (Anxiety) and .53 (Sentimentality), for 
Extraversion between .34 (Sociability), and .47 (Social self-esteem and Liveliness), for 
Agreeableness .34 (Patience), and .54 (Flexibility), for Conscientiousness .33 (Organization) 
and .53 (Diligence), and for Openness .53 (Creativity) and .67 (Inquisitiveness). As expected, 
personality structure is least stable in the first age group but stabilizes in groups 3 and 4. We 
discuss, in detail, stability and content of personality factors on different age groups, and 
practical implications on assessment these results have.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet
C3  - Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (26; 2020, Beograd)
T1  - Developmental Stability Of Seven-factor Personality Structure
IS  - 1
SP  - 14
EP  - 15
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3138
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Stojanović, Anđela and Ilić, Stojan and Tucaković, Lana and Ranđelović, Milan and Jevtić, Miloš and Mijatović, Nevena and Dojčinović, Sara and Dimoski, Jana and Pfattheicher, Stefan and Krstić, Ksenija and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The vast majority of studies investigating personality structure is done using adult samples. If 
personality is assessed in children, parental ratings are preferably used method, while self reports are seldom used. Here we use self-report measures to study the developmental 
stability of the seven-factor personality structure defined by the HEXACO model and 
Disintegration trait. We focus on middle childhood children, young teens, and teenagers. 
Sample consisted of four groups: 1) age 10-11 (N=164, 49.4% female), 2) age 12-13 (N=195, 
48.9% female), 3) age 14-16 (N=319, 59.2% female), 4) age 17-18 (N=201, 49.5% female). 
Data were collected in several elementary and high schools in Serbia and Montenegro. 
Personality traits were assessed using 60 items HEXACO, and 20 items DELTA 
questionnaires. The stability of the seven-factor personality structure was tested using 
orthogonal procrustes rotations, and the analysis was done on facets of all seven personality 
traits. Congruence coefficients and factor loadings were calculated for all facets for all six 
pairwise comparisons. Overall, the average congruence of factors ranged between .69 
(Emotionality) and .96 (Disintegration). The average congruence of facets ranged between 
.41 (Sincerity) and .95 (Sentimentality), with the majority of facets having average 
congruence above .85. Average factor loadings for Disintegration range between .55 (Depression) and .85 (Perceptual Distortions), for Honesty between .20 (Sincerity) and .39 
(Greed avoidance), for Emotionality between .19 (Anxiety) and .53 (Sentimentality), for 
Extraversion between .34 (Sociability), and .47 (Social self-esteem and Liveliness), for 
Agreeableness .34 (Patience), and .54 (Flexibility), for Conscientiousness .33 (Organization) 
and .53 (Diligence), and for Openness .53 (Creativity) and .67 (Inquisitiveness). As expected, 
personality structure is least stable in the first age group but stabilizes in groups 3 and 4. We 
discuss, in detail, stability and content of personality factors on different age groups, and 
practical implications on assessment these results have.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (26; 2020, Beograd)",
title = "Developmental Stability Of Seven-factor Personality Structure",
number = "1",
pages = "14-15",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3138"
}

Lazarević, L. B., Stojanović, A., Ilić, S., Tucaković, L., Ranđelović, M., Jevtić, M., Mijatović, N., Dojčinović, S., Dimoski, J., Pfattheicher, S., Krstić, K.,& Knežević, G.. (2020). Developmental Stability Of Seven-factor Personality Structure. in Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (26; 2020, Beograd)
Beograd: Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet.(1), 14-15.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3138

Lazarević LB, Stojanović A, Ilić S, Tucaković L, Ranđelović M, Jevtić M, Mijatović N, Dojčinović S, Dimoski J, Pfattheicher S, Krstić K, Knežević G. Developmental Stability Of Seven-factor Personality Structure. in Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (26; 2020, Beograd). 2020;(1):14-15.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3138 .

Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Stojanović, Anđela, Ilić, Stojan, Tucaković, Lana, Ranđelović, Milan, Jevtić, Miloš, Mijatović, Nevena, Dojčinović, Sara, Dimoski, Jana, Pfattheicher, Stefan, Krstić, Ksenija, Knežević, Goran, "Developmental Stability Of Seven-factor Personality Structure" in Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (26; 2020, Beograd), no. 1 (2020):14-15,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3138 .